TL/DR –
In 2022, President Biden’s administration passed the Inflation Reduction Act (I.R.A.), projected to cost over $800 billion through 2033, with the aim to address climate change and healthcare costs. The I.R.A. has shown economic benefits, like spurring $282 billion in investments and creating around 175,000 jobs in the first year. However, there are concerns over rising costs and its impact on the federal deficit, though additional tax-collection resources provided by the I.R.A. could potentially generate up to $851 billion in additional tax revenue over the next decade.
Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: Costs, Deficit Implications, and Future Prospects
In 2022, the Biden administration passed the Inflation Reduction Act (I.R.A.), a significant climate change and healthcare legislation. Despite initial scrutiny due to its projected cost of $800 billion through 2033, this law’s economic benefits are evident.
Initially, the Congressional Budget Office (C.B.O.) projected the I.R.A.’s cost to be $391 billion. However, due to the high demand for the legislation’s renewable energy and electric vehicle credits and subsidies, the costs could exceed $800 billion, overshooting initial estimates by more than double.
Yet, according to Goldman Sachs, the I.R.A. spurred around $282 billion in investments and created roughly 175,000 jobs in the first year alone, showcasing its economic potential.
Impacts on Federal Deficit
The escalating I.R.A. costs have stirred concerns about impacts on the federal deficit. The C.B.O. believes the law may add $250 billion more to the deficit than forecasted, putting a question mark on White House’s promises of cost savings.
However, recent Treasury Department forecasts show a brighter side. The enhanced tax-collection resources provided by the I.R.A. could potentially enable the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S.) to collect an additional $851 billion in tax revenue over the next decade, igniting debates on whether the law could actually help in deficit reduction.
The future of the I.R.A., especially under potential diverse political climates like a possible Trump second term, remains unclear. The endurance of this law amidst potential policy reversals is yet to be determined.
—
Read More US Economic News