Understanding the Evolution of Political Corruption in the USA
Historical Context of Corruption in American Politics
The behavior we are witnessing in the present time is a reflection and amplification of the systemic degradation of norms infecting all federal government branches. Corruption in America has seen its ups and downs, with past major issues like the rampant briberies of the Gilded Age and the infamous Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s, which resulted in the imprisonment of the secretary of the interior.
The Shift in Corruption Modalities
Reforms have significantly reduced individual personal enrichment, but more pervasive corruption forms have surfaced, particularly with the increasing influence of money in politics. Curtailing this form of corruption has been challenging, partly due to Supreme Court interference. Notably, both Democratic and Republican administrations have been embroiled in corruption scandals, with instances ranging from President Clinton’s questionable overnight stays at the White House for campaign donors to controversies surrounding President Trump’s undivested business interests.
The Influence of Money in Policy Decisions
The influence of wealthy donors in shaping policy has been prevalent in modern U.S. politics, particularly following the Supreme Court’s 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Besides shaping policies, large campaign contributors are often rewarded with ceremonial or symbolic positions in the administration. President Trump’s administration, for instance, is known for appointing wealthy donors to key roles and using fundraising events for personal profit.
Self-Enrichment and Insider Trading
President Trump’s approach to merging the powers of the presidency with his business and personal assets has been unprecedented. Other officials in his administration have also benefited by handling matters related to their own or their family’s investments. Furthermore, Congress members have profited from lax enforcement of insider trading rules, and Supreme Court justices have accepted extravagant gifts without transparency or accountability.
Coercive Tactics and Lawsuits
Trump has distinctly used personal lawsuits to seek payments from companies he disapproves of, an approach not seen in modern American history. Companies like ABC, Meta, and Paramount have agreed to large settlements to avoid legal battles, despite the perceived meritless claims.
Read More US Economic News