TL/DR –
The Alaska House of Representatives is preparing to vote on a bill that could legalize subscription-based access to medical providers, a system known as direct healthcare agreements. The bill, supported by conservative advocacy groups, allows patients to pay monthly fees for specified medical care, offering an alternative to traditional health insurance, and potentially reducing healthcare costs by cutting red tape. Critics, however, argue the bill could enable healthcare providers to discriminate against patients with severe medical conditions, setting unaffordable rates and limiting options for those dependent on public health insurance.
Alaska House to Vote on Medical Subscription Bill
Alaska’s House of Representatives is set to vote on a bill aimed at legalizing subscription-based health care services. The proposed legislation encourages patients to pay a monthly subscription fee to access medical care, offering an alternative to traditional health insurance or supplementing high-deductible plans. It also caters to individuals seeking premium, on-demand healthcare, termed “concierge medicine”.
Senate Bill 45, previously passed by Alaska Senate, is supported by conservative advocacy groups Alaska Policy Forum and Americans for Prosperity. They argue it will decrease healthcare costs by eliminating the bureaucracy and paperwork associated with private health insurance plans. However, critics express concerns that it could lead to discriminatory practices against patients with severe medical conditions by setting prohibitive service rates, and limit healthcare options for those dependent on public health insurance such as Medicare and Medicaid.
During the bill’s recent consideration, lawmakers agreed to restrict the bill’s application to primary care providers, excluding specialists from offering direct health agreements. They also agreed to mandate that primary care providers continue accepting new Medicare patients, and maintain a practice in which at least 20% of patients are either Medicare-enrolled or uninsured. Despite this progress, an amendment that would require clinics to be Alaskan-owned to prevent acquisition by private equity firms was narrowly voted down.
Lawmakers likewise voted down an amendment barring providers from discriminating in the provision of direct agreements on grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Despite Alaska law’s lack of specific prohibition against such discrimination, State Attorney General Treg Taylor advised against it.
Presently, direct health care agreements are not permitted under state law. However, some providers have been offering such agreements for years. This development led Lori Wing-Heier, Director of Insurance at the Division of Insurance, to state last year that action might be taken against providers offering such plans without a state statute permitting them. If approved by the House next week, the bill will return to the Senate for a final vote due to modifications by the House.
—
Read More Health & Wellness News ; US News