Dave Simpson: Did Biden’s Team Make Any Correct Choices?
TL/DR –
The article is a personalized critique of the Biden Administration, questioning the efficacy and decisions made by senior advisors. The author criticizes the administration’s immigration policy, suggesting it led to an increase in crime, and the “Inflation Reduction Act”, which allegedly resulted in higher spending and inflation. Other issues questioned are the suspension of SAT tests for university entries, the “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” policies, and the theoretical banning of gas stoves and cars.
A Closer Look at Advisor Roles in the Biden Administration
A recent television interview starred a figure with an interesting title: a “senior advisor to the Biden Administration.” As a viewer, one has to wonder what that title might look like on a resume. And more importantly, what does this role entail in an administration that’s seen its fair share of criticism?
Roles and Influence of Advisors
The role and influence of advisors in any administration surface in the form of policy decisions and strategies. The pressing question is, do monumental mistakes bear the signature of senior advisors? Conversely, are the lesser, though still significant, missteps the handiwork of junior advisors who are climbing the bureaucratic ladder? The possibility also exists for a junior advisor to make a colossal error, thus ironically fast-tracking their promotion to a senior advisor role.
Interestingly, the featured advisor was a youthful, perhaps mid-30s individual, possibly a product of an Ivy League institution. This brings to mind the question, would you entrust someone half your age with providing sage advice, barring medical practitioners of course?
The Question of Efficacy
When it comes to the efficacy of paid consultants, varied opinions exist. A mechanical engineer might liken them to a pesky rash, offering little more than irritation. The effectiveness of advisors, particularly in the policy-making realm, merits serious consideration in light of the decisions impacting the nation.
Was there an advisor who voiced caution against opening the country’s borders to an estimated 12 to 20 million undocumented immigrants, as per Donald Trump’s assertion? The issue of border control has been a significant point of contention, with accusations of irresponsible policy decisions leading to an increase in crime.
Controversial Decisions
Controversial decisions under the Biden Administration are numerous. For instance, the “Inflation Reduction Act”, which ironically increased spending by $500 billion and inflation to 9 percent, a temporary high. Do such decisions reflect the counsel of senior advisors, or are they simply absent during these critical decision-making moments?
Other contentious moves include the “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion” drive that touched every facet of American life, the suspension of the SAT for many top universities, and an abundance of new regulations. Additionally, the historical precedent of the FBI raiding the private home of a former President has been cause for debate. Perhaps these decisions are a testament to the quality of advice being given?
Administration Advisors: A Broader View
Bad advice isn’t exclusive to the Biden Administration, as demonstrated with Eric Holder’s role in vetting vice presidential candidates for Kamala Harris. Former Governor Tim Walz’s nomination stands as a stark example of potentially questionable senior advising.
Given the criticisms of the Biden Administration, one may find it refreshing to reflect on previous administrations. As we evaluate the Biden Administration, it’s challenging to pinpoint a universally praised action or policy. Perhaps the most agreeable move made was his eventual retirement.
Contact Dave Simpson at: DaveSimpson145@hotmail.com
—
Read More US Economic News