Federal Agencies Invite Previously Released Employees to Return to Work
TL/DR –
Federal agencies are inviting employees who had previously left the organization to return, in light of the rushed and potentially ill-considered workforce reduction processes. Depending on the employees’ exit conditions, they could be compelled to return under the terms of their resignation agreements. Some federal employees — such as probationary ones whose terminations are being challenged by judges — may be caught up in further reduction processes, creating confusion about their employment status.
Terry Gerton: Discussing Federal Workforce Reinstatements
Terry Gerton: Federal agencies are actively encouraging formerly released employees to rejoin the federal workforce. What insights can you share about this occasion?
John Hatton: Agencies likely overshot their reduction goals, causing a need for talent in certain sectors. This need for skilled individuals was predictable given the rushed nature of the workforce reduction process.
Terry Gerton: Optional Return to Federal Workforce?
Terry Gerton: Is it an optional decision for individuals to return to the federal workforce?
John Hatton: With regards to deferred resignation offers, agencies have the right to rescind these offers and request employees to resume work. Hence, the decision might not be optional for all.
Discussion on Probationary Employees
Terry Gerton: What about probationary employees who were let go and are now seeing their separations halted?
John Hatton: Case results vary with some probationary employees being ordered back to work, while others might still be embroiled in reduction procedures. Invalidation of initial firing doesn’t exempt them from further reduction processes.
Advice from NARFE
Terry Gerton: What advice is NARFE providing to employees grappling with the uncertainty of their employment status?
John Hatton: Advice varies depending on individual circumstances, career stage, and retirement planning. Some are considering retirement, while others are looking elsewhere due to the turmoil in the federal workforce.
The Schedule F Policy Career Rule
Terry Gerton: What are the trends in the comments submitted regarding the Schedule F policy career rule?
John Hatton: The latest figures show around 40,000 comments submitted, many opposing the rule. NARFE is also formally commenting and actively fighting the implementation of Schedule F.
Future of the Schedule F Policy Career Rule
Terry Gerton: What is the likely timeline for OPM to respond?
John Hatton: Uncertain, but they seem to be expediting the process. I hope they review all comments received and reconsider if this is the best path forward.
Federal Benefits on the Hill
Terry Gerton: Any news on federal benefits?
John Hatton: The Senate is examining two provisions relating to probationary periods and retirement contributions. Another surviving provision is to eliminate the FERS annuity supplement by 2028. The reconciliation bill is expected to be finalized by the end of the month.
Copyright © 2025 Federal News Network. All rights reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
—
Read More US Political News