EPA and Energy: Deregulation Consequences Examined by Bergeson & Campbell
TL/DR –
The Trump Administration is pursuing a deregulatory strategy with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which some fear will sacrifice environmental protections for economic growth. The Administration’s actions have been criticised for being too broad, potentially harming scientific functions and administrative safeguards, despite reassurances from EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. The policy also extends to energy and infrastructure sectors, with the government expediting coal leasing on public lands and causing disruption with a freeze on electric vehicle charging infrastructure funding.
U.S. EPA’s Deregulatory Scrutiny and Its Impacts
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) currently faces scrutiny under the Trump Administration due to its regulatory rollbacks and broader deregulatory strategy. Many worry these changes might risk environmental protections for the sake of economic growth.
Although the Administration’s deregulatory approach was welcomed by some industry sectors, implementation has been like broad cuts rather than a targeted approach. Deregulatory actions have inflicted unintended damage including critical safeguards and scientific functions. This trajectory has raised concerns about the EPA’s mission.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has sought to assuage fears, stating that deregulation will not harm the environment. However, the sharp contrast between reassurances and the ongoing efforts to reduce regulations leaves stakeholders uneasy.
The Administration’s focus is on confronting “entrenched bureaucracy,” prioritizing efficiency and fulfilling campaign promises. Critics see these moves as undermining institutional expertise and neglecting science-driven decision-making. They seek more transparency regarding the results of these efforts.
The energy policy is a prominent aspect of this deregulation effort. A recent Executive Order pushes for coal leasing on public lands, labeling coal as a “critical mineral” to meet rising energy demands from AI and data centers. However, coal’s economic competitiveness remains limited due to market forces and state-level clean energy mandates.
The freeze on electric vehicle charging infrastructure funding has affected several states. Concerns are also arising in aviation and alternative fuels sectors facing potential funding uncertainties from the Inflation Reduction Act and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Recently, Judge Mary McElroy ordered the reinstatement of previously awarded funds under these acts, emphasizing the financial instability of the current regulatory landscape. The decision to freeze these funds has been criticized as a step back and a threat to local economies.
In a social media post, President Trump invited companies to relocate to the U.S. with promises of speedy approvals and no environmental delays. However, the promise of speed may be outweighed by the loss of policy clarity, stability, and long-term sustainability.
[View source.]
—
Read More US Economic News