Kari Lake’s Stance on ‘Dreamers’ Deportation: Awaiting Clarity

115

TL/DR –

US Senate candidate Kari Lake has advocated for deporting all illegal immigrants, but has not clarified whether this includes “Dreamers,” those brought to the US illegally as children. She has also shifted her stance on abortion, previously calling it the “ultimate sin” and expressing support for laws criminalizing it, but now stating she does not support a federal ban. This change in rhetoric is seen as an attempt to appeal to moderate voters.


U.S. Senate Candidate Kari Lake’s Evasive Tactics

U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake is masterful at dodging questions. Known for her “Kari Lake sidestep”, she often deflects difficult queries, including those about “Dreamers”.

Recently, Lake reiterated her call for deportation of undocumented immigrants during her critiques of the now-defunct bipartisan border closure plan. She insists on sorting out and repatriating the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants in the U.S., including those who came as children.

Lake’s Stance on ‘Dreamers’ Deportation

When asked to clarify her position on deporting ‘Dreamers’, Lake was noncommittal. She launched into a tirade against the media, accusing them of twisting language to make those advocating for community security look bad.

Lake’s Skillful Deflection

Lake is adept at shifting the focus of the conversation. She expresses compassion for incoming immigrants, but swiftly moves to emphasize her concern for American citizens, whom she believes are being overshadowed by the immigration issue.

Lake’s Dance Around Her Abortion Stance

Appealing to moderate voters requires Lake to carefully navigate controversial topics like abortion. Despite previously calling abortion the “ultimate sin” and supporting the overturning of Roe v. Wade, Lake now sidesteps the issue, focusing on state rights over a federal ban.

Lake’s Shift in Abortion Stance

During her 2022 campaign, Lake supported a “carbon copy” of the Texas law banning abortion after six weeks and called for the banning of abortion pills. Now, she avoids the topic, preferring to change the subject altogether.

In conclusion, Lake’s ability to deftly dodge questions and shift the narrative is noteworthy. Whether discussing immigration or abortion, she skillfully sidesteps direct answers, leaving voters guessing her true stance.


Read More US Media News