Supreme Court Liberals Voice Dissents Over Recent Rulings

TL/DR –

The conservative majority of the Supreme Court has been winning numerous cases recently, and liberal judges have been taking the unusual step of publicly reading their dissenting opinions. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson have used this opportunity to draw attention to their views, particularly on issues such as homelessness and federal regulation. However, their dissenting statements have no legal weight and are mainly a tool for expressing disagreement with the majority opinion.

In Supreme Court Dissents, Liberal Justices Grab Their Moments

The conservative Supreme Court majority has been victorious in recent cases, yet liberal dissenters are seizing their moment in the courtroom. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson have made powerful dissenting statements this week, drawing public attention to their views amidst conservative dominance.

One notable case where liberal voices rose was after Justice Neil Gorsuch announced the 6-3 decision letting an Oregon city ticket homeless people for sleeping outside. Sotomayor responded, stating the law “punishes them for being homeless.”

Sharp, bluntly worded dissents are predominantly wielded by liberals, who openly express their disagreements with the right-wing majority. Despite adding no legal weight to dissenting opinions, oral dissents give hidden justices a platform to magnify their objections to the majority’s rulings.

Another heated decision on Friday was Chief Justice John Roberts’ ruling significantly curtailing the power of federal regulators and empowering judges. Justice Kagan vehemently denounced the “massive shock” to the complex federal system that regulates pollution, safeguards drugs, and protects consumer and investor interests.

The court majority reversed a 1984 precedent, causing consternation among liberals. This is the third time in three years conservatives have reversed substantial, decades-old precedents. In previous years, they overturned a 1978 case allowing racial affirmative action in college admissions and the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision granting women the constitutional right to terminate pregnancy.

In the Idaho abortion dispute, the majority dismissed the case, prompting a dissent from Justice Jackson, the court’s newest member and first African American woman. She said the court had missed an opportunity to bring clarity and certainty to a tragic situation. “We owe them,” she said, “an answer.”

—
Read More US News