City Council Scrutinizes Mayor’s ‘City of Yes’ Housing Proposal Amid Criticisms
TL/DR –
The New York City Council is reviewing Mayor Bill de Blasio’s “City of Yes” housing plan, which seeks to increase housing availability over the next 15 years by changing zoning codes. The new codes would allow for more housing in commercial districts, multi-family districts, and backyards. However, critics argue the plan will destroy neighborhood identities and overly strain existing infrastructure.
The mayor’s housing proposal, dubbed the “City of Yes,” is under scrutiny from local lawmakers. The plan outlines a significant boost in the housing supply across all five New York City boroughs over the next 15 years.
Key Details
- The City Council scrutinized the mayor\’s \”City of Yes\” housing plan at a six-hour hearing.
- The plan proposes altering outdated zoning laws to allow more housing in commercial districts, multi-family districts, and backyards.
- However, opponents argue the plan could detrimentally alter neighborhoods and strain already stressed infrastructure.
“We are in a housing crisis. But how we expand our housing stock must cater to the diverse needs of our neighborhoods. Similar zoning doesn’t mean identical circumstances,” said City Councilman Rafael Salamanca during Monday’s housing hearing.
The plan seeks to amend archaic zoning codes to enable the construction of more housing units in a wider variety of areas.
“This is the most ambitious housing policy in New York’s history. A first for a Merrill administration, the policy proposes creating new housing in every neighborhood, regardless of density,” claimed Dan Garodnick, of the Department of City Planning.
Despite this, the plan faces considerable criticism.
Council members and locals argue that the scheme lacks community consultations and overlooks district-specific concerns.
“Could you explain how this plan will address the flooding issues that have plagued my constituents?” inquired City Councilmember Kevin Riley.
“Transit-oriented development covers a mere 3% of my district, leaving 75% of the borough excluded,” pointed out City Councilmember Kamillah Hanks.
City officials rebuffed certain criticisms, with Garodnick stating that a review of potential impacts revealed no major concerns with water and sewer infrastructure. However, existing issues in various neighborhoods need continued attention, he added.
Garodnick also emphasized that each district must contribute to the housing solution and cannot choose not to participate.
Consequently, some residents fear the plan could ruin their neighborhoods. The City Council will facilitate a public hearing on Tuesday to discuss the plan further.
—
Read More US Political News