Supreme Court appears open to some protection in Trump immunity case, despite division
TL/DR –
The conservative majority of the Supreme Court appeared open to recognizing some level of immunity from federal prosecution for the official acts of former presidents, during arguments about former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election case. The court, however, expressed skepticism towards Trump’s broad argument that he should be absolutely immune from charges related to conduct while he was in office. The case may be sent back to lower courts to determine whether Trump’s alleged actions surrounding the 2020 election were taken in his capacity as an office-seeker or office-holder.
Supreme Court Consideration for Immunity of Former Presidents
Conservative Supreme Court Justices were open to granting some level of immunity to former presidents during a recent discussion of Donald Trump’s immunity claim related to his 2020 election case. However, they expressed skepticism towards the claim that presidents should be absolutely immune from charges related to their term in office.
The Question of Presidential Immunity
The question of whether immunity extends to former presidents for actions while in office has sparked divisions. The conservative bloc indicated that some presidential actions may warrant immunity from criminal charges, but there is uncertainty about whether that immunity extends to private conduct. Potentially, the case could be returned to lower courts to determine whether Trump’s alleged 2020 election actions were performed as a candidate or office-holder.
Trump, charged with four criminal counts for allegedly attempting to undermine the presidential power transfer post-2020 election, has pleaded not guilty. The case is being overseen by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
The Potential Consequences of the Immunity Case
The outcome of the immunity case has potential implications for Trump’s pending trial. If Trump wins, his federal prosecution in Washington ends. However, if the Supreme Court sides with the special counsel, who has previously succeeded in lower courts, the case could resume.
Simultaneously, Trump is facing 34 felony counts in Manhattan for allegedly falsifying business records. The former president has also pleaded not guilty to these charges.
Oral Arguments
The justices debated what constitutes an ‘official act,’ with several conservative justices voicing concerns that the decision could be used against future presidents. Liberal justices, on the other hand, expressed concerns with unchecked presidential power potentially leading to criminal activity while in office.
The Trump Immunity Case
The case against Trump has been paused as the matter of immunity progresses. The special counsel argues that the Constitution does not grant a president absolute immunity from criminal prosecution, especially for private acts related to campaigning. Trump’s lawyers counter that his post-election actions are part of his official duties and that a loss of immunity could potentially weaken future presidencies. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for the legal treatment of former presidents’ actions during office.
—
Read More US Political News